A Sample Of A Holographic Will

Pleasantville

Dear friends of the blog,

after a year and a half, we want to thank you for the attention they have given us, but we give you also need to stop, perhaps a bit 'or perhaps forever , our business. For some time we have reduced the output of new posts and, in fact, we were too few and too busy working to maintain an acceptable pace. We counted on to increase the number of employees, but this did not happen. We hope in any case he had done useful work and we hope that our posts, not being hooked to the ongoing problems, continue to be useful to new visitors.

With best wishes for a good 2011 and a warm greeting,

The editors of the blog

Mountandblade Searial

Gary Ross is not a figure of first floor of the Hollywood world, but it is a good and conscientious craftsman who uses his head and heart to do good things. He has built a career as a writer and has toured as a director, only two films: Pleasantville (1998) and Seabiscuit (2003). I've seen both films with great pleasure, but the first gave me hope .... Yes, because in a world in which good sense, understanding the feelings and love for life do not have much success, I felt a sense of hope seeing these three things well made and well mixed in a single work.

The film was also appreciated, but it has become a myth. I'll try to summarize the core of the story and especially the contents of this little gem that I hope will be seen in DVD players from the blog.

The beginning is bizarre and, essentially, science fiction, two children (brother and sister) today, are "sucked" into a parallel world that is to a sit-com television in black and white fifties. The boy is a fan of series that was revived after a half century to viewers and then, being in that "world" knows all and moves with a certain familiarity. While his sister does it feel like a fish out of water.

Let us now understand the details of that "world". It 's the world of the "average man" in which each character does not aspire to anything other than what is required by tradition and by the rising consumerism. A world in black and white not only in colors but also the emotional. The inhabitants of this world, in fact, being characters of the sitcom, and not people, they know only what we as people can think and feel. They work, dine the evening, wash the car on Sunday. They are always cheerful, gossip and trivia and have no interest in the world outside their town. The world of youth the world is unthinkable in a sit-com era and do not include (as per their own parents) nor sex nor a complete emotional dimension. The boys did not even kiss and talk to their parents' clothes or playing basketball but not much. In simple and reassuring the world that there are social problems, but neither fire: firefighters are called only to recover lost cats.

At school you attend programs oversimplified and did not learn anything about the history of the society in which the country is immerso. La geografia inizia e finisce con le strade di Pleasantville e quando Jennifer (che è calata nel personaggio di Mary Sue) chiede all’insegnante cosa ci sia “oltre” Pleasantville suscita solo un imbarazzo generale. I libri hanno le pagine bianche, dato che non si deve imparare nulla sul mondo, ma si deve solo confermare ciò che si già si conosce di quel microcosmo incantato. Tutto è così compatto, perfettino e “grigio” che non esistono conflitti di nessun tipo e nemmeno domande capaci di trascendere l’ordine dato.

In quegli anni, anche i nostri prodotti televisivi non sollevavano grandi problemi e non riflettevano abitualmente drammi sociali. Miravano quindi a rassicurare and distract people from the problems of society, but also conveyed the content and touched the edges of our culture. In the United States, however, these products were truly hypnotic and television were commonplace in an exaggerated way.

Now, what the director has proposed building this absurd situation with two guys now trapped in an unreal world populated by characters of a simple sit-com of the past without any human depth? The director is proposed to use the situation as a suitable metaphor to represent in an "excessive" rites and myths of real people who now live in the real world of "little" just because they feel and think. The director We then launched an SOS inviting us to be wary of the tendency in all of us to "lose" in the rituals of daily life, the Convention, the chatter, shared habits. A trend that, in a shade less pronounced than the characters of Plesasantville, protects us from feelings making us feel a little pain but also cutting off our ability to rejoice and be really happy.

The two boys (real ones) of the film initially a different attitude. He (David, played by Tobey Maguire) tries not to disturb the established order, assuming that the characters in that world could not tolerate stresses foreign to their mentality. She (Jennifer, played by Reese Whitherspoon) instead is very annoyed by dall'ottusità and respectability of the people are forced to interact and take provocative behavior. In fact it creates a chain reaction due to the behavior "unthinkable" by Jennifer, for this, the characters are the quiet town to deal with stimuli, questions and situations unrelated to their mental coordinates. Gradually, the reality of the town in black and white colors become space.

The film is on track this early, but remains on the surface: in fact, the characters in Pleasantville are not generally disturbed by the "diversity" of these stresses, but they are just deeply shocked by the stimuli that trigger their self-expressive potential of those who, as characters, repressed. And when you "catch" an aspect of their "inner unspoken" take "color". Pleasantville gradually becomes a world of color, as the real and the characters of that world become people with doubts, hopes, joys, sufferings, wants to ask questions, sexual desires, intellectual curiosity.

The film, therefore, is not schematic. Not so elementary repeats the myth of sexual and cultural revolution, or even suggests the idea of \u200b\u200bgenerational revolt or criticism of respectability. Gradually touches all the nodes of our fear of life, from the emotional to the social to the intellectual. Makes this perfectly the idea of \u200b\u200bthe way that each of us needs to do to break free from their chains, very private. The trick of the characters that people have become a disruptive force and thus allows us to ask ourselves what we are willing to live our lives and what we are used to refine them in order to avoid intense and authentic experiences.

not alone. David, who initially does not want to put in a process of destabilization, is still to be addressed by the various characters put in crisis situations arising from Jennifer. This is striking is the delicacy with which David responds to requests (and anxieties) of the characters: it is not proposed as a champion of their "liberation", but it shows care and respect for their fear of change and also to their need for change . Fails to understand that the world is black and white in which the characters lived, and the world in color that gradually they are winning. Nothing, therefore, schematically "revolutionary" (as was almost inevitable in the late '60s). In the film, some leaving the black and retrieve their color freeing their sexuality, others make the same change in reading a book, and others expressing the necessary aggression in the face of abuse and other showing emotion. The film is also shown intolerance of the most "resistant" to change, but such intolerance is carefully analyzed as a reflection of fear. In fact, people who throw stones at a window painted or devalue people "color" or burn the books (which now no longer have the white pages), while expressing many emotions (negative), are in black and white prisoners their fear of life and feelings.

The film does not set a pattern to another, but it shows that we can dispense with the forms. The film, in practice, is a tribute to our potential and not an incitement and predictable changes in rates. The film emphasizes the value of our inner dimension and can be treated with discretion to our habitual tendency to live "characters," is to affirm our need to express ourselves fully as human beings.

Gianfranco

Public Auction California Real Estate

Music Therapy - Music Therapy for the idea ten

Chinese character for the action to hear

For a deep listening
(more than an idea, a reflection)

You know, Mom, what is the company more delicata e importante che dovrai affrontare da genitore? Imparare ad ascoltare profondamente il tuo bambino.

In estrema sintesi, tutti i giochi musicali e sonori che ti racconto e che metterai in atto riconducono a questo grande obiettivo.
Avrai spesso sentito parlare di amore incondizionato . Il concetto è meno astratto o esistenziale di quanto si pensi. La predisposizione all’amore per il proprio figlio, innato in ogni genitore, è tuttavia sporcato , alterato e filtrato dai bisogni, le paure, i pregiudizi e gli attaccamenti che ogni persona vive ogni giorno e che si manifestano attraverso l’ armatura psicosomatica che indossa ognuno di noi.
Devi pensare a quel grumo of emotions, habits and conditioning as a veil in front of you with your spiritual eyes, that cloud your opinion and change the way things are, even your relationship with your child and, ultimately, listening to and understanding of his needs and his emotions.
Your son is himself and your mirror, at the same time. Mirror of your actions, the revelation of his vocation. The parent is responsible for e- ducare , to bring out and support the enormous potential of new life.
In this human journey special, wonderful and full of surprises, uncertainties and unexpected joys, has an important role the ability to meet and welcome your baby.

one punto di vista musicale, ogni essere vivente è una vera orchestra che suona in modo organico il concerto dell’esistere. A te il compito di imparare ad ascoltare il suo battito cardiaco, il suo respiro, il ritmo dei suoi movimenti, la musicalità delle sue lallazioni e delle sue pernacchie,… e anche il suono delle sue paure, i tempi dei suoi silenzi e dei suoi tentennamenti. Dovrai riuscire a esprimergli la fiducia di potersi manifestare per quello che è, per quello che prova realmente, e non per quello che vorresti che fosse o dovrebbe essere.
Tu, mamma, hai un punto di vista e una posizione di ascolto privilegiate. Quando lo allatti, ascolta il ritmo delle suzioni, delle pause per respirare o per il ruttino. Quando lo culli, first seeks contact with his breathing, to listen and understand in what state is. Over time, you'll see how it changes with breathing and lung growth as varied during the day on the basis of his emotional states. Listen to the sound of his movements, the tension of his muscles, his was a general tonic. So you can learn when you need to stimulate and soothe him when necessary. Listen when you leave, and appreciate every second of that abandonment, because it is precious and rare and will fade very quickly. Learn how to reinforce it when they need to scold him when needed and have the resources to be able to receive, when you hold it away in the sea of \u200b\u200bhis emotions, arousal and fatigue. It would be useful to punish him when he just tired and agitated, the place would not be useful to him when he is thinking in his own way, to understand, not very useful role when you're away from your tests. Learn to not take action to irritation or reaction, but depending on what you need each other. It is an art, this one, which grows day by day with the action. An art that, in case of errors, is constantly renewed and always allows you to start over. While this
developments carefully, and learn to interact with him through the art of nonverbal communication and insight, remember that you are putting a solid foundation for the communication of a life. In many families, at some point, communication between parents and children is impossible?
But we know that to really listen, you learn to do some 'of silence within you. Are you deafened by your emotions, frustrations, expectations, conventions and habits, it will be very little that can filter your deep listening. And your son will become the background of your requirements, will be a shadow, often intrusive, too demanding, disturbing and provocative.
the contrary, it will become a unique opportunity to discover the truth and love. It will be the epicenter of a profound transformation in you and who around you.

What Is Mononucleosis And Condition_symptoms

growth - nine

going to sleep - rocking music

Dear mother, your child will find a variety of techniques to test you. It is a matter of course, has to do with confidence, with the growth, with fear, with differentiation, with pain, with hope, with the balance ...

For this reason, when your child does not wants to sleep, try not to get angry. Use these difficult times for in-depth and really meet your puppy.
If you were sighted during pregnancy have selected a group of beautiful music for you , exciting, joyful and have listened to your whole belly. You'll sing and you'll move to the rhythm of this wonderful music. If you did, know that you have already prepared a good common ground with which to develop a deep communication with your baby, and that everything will be easier. But remember, the music is not a magic, is not neutral, does not solve every problem alone, let alone that of sleep.
If your child is upset and want him to sleep for a clear night, remember that the first thing you'll not have to stay calm and send peace to your puppy. It is important and not always you can. Demoralized and not start again. If you have a close companion, You can alternate with flexible support your rhythms and your moods. If your baby to rock with beautiful music and you are deeply agitated and impatient, your effort will be maximum and minimum results.
and pay close attention to the music you play together. Think asleep as a journey, a transformation from a state of wakefulness, presence, agitation, movement in one's sleep, relaxation, calm. You teach your baby to let go. You have to teach him right away to make a path that is always useful in life: to calm the agitation and find peace.
In this process, music can help you, but it can also being your obstacle. If your baby is agitated, and uses music too quiet, does not establish any relationship with him. The music will be too far from his state of mind. And vice versa. Train yourself to observe your child, to understand the mood and to choose the music closest to him. Then start on the path. Later, you can gradually bring your child to a state of greater peace, with the help of the sweetest music, calm and meditative. Or you can abandon the recorded music to make room for your voice.
While listening to music together, dance, sing, have fun with him. If you are nervous and struggling to find peace, focus on the music you like, the feelings in the body, movement and your breath. Reflected the positive feelings that the music has always evoked in you. Do not want to think about the fact that she sleeps. Think of the joy of music and share with him this time. Just this. The rest will come by itself. If music is not an escape, is a perfect common ground where emotionally intense experiences, where you build your relationship. Where to learn together.
But you're always careful. It will not go away before they'll get used to listen too hard on your child. As I explain in the next idea.

Pet Containment Wire Diagram

2011 Christmas Lunch 2010

Christmas Lunch 2010

Appetizer

Prosecco

pastry with gorgonzola cheese and walnuts and rosemary

chicken liver crostini and the kale

Pecorino cheese with honey and spicy sauce with green tomatoes

First

Gnudi of ricotta and spinach with butter and sage

Tortelli homemade potato sull'anatra

According and contour

turkey stuffed with milk sauce

and baked potatoes white mountain

Cut Florentine

with cabbage cap grilled

Dolce

tart apples and walnuts in the house with

accompanied by vinsanto

Beverages

Natural water / sparkling Tuscan red wine and coffee

Euro 35,00 / person

BOOK: 0574-956045 - cell.
335-6817840 EMAIL: INFO @ AGRITURISMOSELVAPIANA . IT

Msds For Plaid Clear Acrylic Sealer Matte

The weakness of the left

Two characteristics shared by the representatives of the political right and left: the maintenance of economic and social system as a reference point untouchable and the seduction of the electorate. Although these two characteristics do not make the same parties right and left, must be recognized that the lowering of the reference values \u200b\u200bof the left has made the left parties increasingly similar to those on the right. I would like to deal briefly with these two characteristics shared by the activities of the political right and left.

The "system" is a nightmare characterized by some fundamental aspects:

a) an economy based on the pursuit of maximum profit (a few),

b) a state machine pachyderm, inefficient and expensive

c) a complex social stratification in which the dramatic and insurmountable gap between rich and poor, privileged intermediate layers are added and at various pests,

d) a lower class made up of workers looking for a permanent position (not even guaranteed)

e) a culture of mass- from conformity, from the traditional mode and

f) a solid grounding of corruption and crime.

The right-wing politicians obviously have no intention to change this "system" simply because they defend the social classes that suck the nectar of the system itself, or are members of the ruling elite that, in addition to money want a direct management of the power system that protects them. These politicians, given the formal order of our democratic society, to have their own interests, however, need to persuade a majority of the electorate to leave them the power.

To do resort to old and new media: declare themselves bearers of values \u200b\u200b'traditional' demonize each alternative, even moderate, the bearer of chaos, can not handle is the unconventional means of mass communication, have to dismantle the culture Voters as ignorant as to believe their nonsense, distract the gullible from the real issues (the exploitation of workers and social injustice) inventing dangers da contrastare “tutti assieme” (gli extracomunitari, i comunisti, le minoranze, ecc.), sostengono miti “collettivi” e interclassisti (alcuni pensano ancora alla patria mentre altri si sono inventati la padania).

I politici di sinistra dovrebbero essere distinti in due categorie: quelli che operano nei partiti di sinistra e che hanno solo obiettivi personali (potere personale, privilegi, vantaggi economici) e quelli che operano per finalità specificamente politiche. Il problema del conflitto di interessi che rende “anomalo” il nostro paese non è stato risolto dai governi di destra ma nemmeno da quelli “di sinistra”. Ciò significa che una parte rilevante of the left did not want to remove this anomaly and that many of its leading figures are involved in the power system. But I would only deal with left-wing politicians and historians who share the values \u200b\u200bof the left [cf. POST right and left categories as political and ethical ]. They do not envisage radical reforms and beneficial to their constituencies and potential, that is for all citizens not covered by the elite in power, simply because they can not imagine. For example, the current free market system can be expected to put millions of families on the street when a company has the need to fail (for false) or to transfer production to other countries. This system also consists of the quell'elemosina layoff is temporary, particularly humiliating and borne by society, that of other workers. If the right wants to prop up this system, the next "authentic" working to improve left as is, left-wing politicians do not even imagine another type of social protection of unemployed workers (ie, a socially organized use of their capacities) but sympathize with the workers and demand more handouts.

entire left-wing politics is a better idea of \u200b\u200bsociety as it is. The left historical, in other words is represented by enlightened conservatives and goodwill.

Ideally, then, these left-wing politicians do not offer anything radically new and genuinely respectful of people. Reassure moderates that they will not do "too much confusion," reassure the bigots that religion will always be a privileged club, and "more equal than others" reassure people that the TV will change nothing, except a little more justice and any further participation in the democratic system as it is [cf. POST The banality of politics ].

In pratica, questo disastro costituito da un’intera classe politica, si traduce in un’opera di seduzione dell’elettorato che non tocca i valori profondi delle persone. I politici di destra alimentano tradizionalismi, regionalismi e allarmismi pretestuosi, mentre quelli di sinistra alimentano il vittimismo e la “rassegnazione costruttiva”, cioè l’idea che la società sia immodificabile ma migliorabile.

Se i politici di destra sono i mastini del potere, quelli di sinistra non complici sono, di fatto, un puntello del potere, perché mirano a mantenerlo migliorandone vari aspetti. Ciò che manca è una fitta schiera di politici di sinistra capaci di immaginare una società diversa nella sua struttura e nei suoi valori e che quindi sollecitino l’elettorato ad esprimere sul piano politico la volontà di cambiamenti profondi e vantaggiosi per tutti (tranne che per l’elite al potere). Capaci cioè di stimolare anziché sedurre, di unire anziché massificare e di far leva sul senso di dignità delle persone e sulla necessità di costruire una società più comunitaria e meno frantumata e anonima [cfr. il POST Emmanuel Mounier e il personalismo ].

I politici più giovani (o meno anziani) manifestano spesso alcune convinzioni condivisibili (ad esempio istanze ecologiste e l’esigenza di un impegno serio nei confronti della Corruption and organized crime). However, do not have the strength to draw positive idea of \u200b\u200balternative society. A society that does not destroy the environment and that is not dominated by criminals and corrupt a society is still undefined. Gather consensus against this management system but do not paint a different system. Fuel a rage that can not be constructive because it aims at targets positively delineated.

All proposals that have crossed our blogs are unrelated to any political program: a social and those expressed in the posts of the "person, community, society and politics", both of type culture expressed in the posts of the "normal madness in culture and society." In this sense, our blog fits into the genre of science fiction and not in the culture and politics.

then? Then, in the absence of a policy "good" to be strongly supported, there are only options "reserve": staying out of the loop of illusions and support movements or parties "less worse" than others when you go to vote, and above all , continue to think and to cultivate good ideas, irreducible to the more established schemes.

Gaetano

Ontario Trailor Certification

Basically we are all puppies

Few people are beautiful pups. I am talking about baby animals, including among them even our puppies: infants and children. In fact there are people insensitive to the puppies or even able to extend to them the "niceties" just do not look too "rough." However, it seems a characteristic rooted in the human ability to appreciate the well wishes and also protect their young. Even the other animals, often combative with their peers or members of other species give up their aggression towards puppies.

I believe a thorough discussion on the reasons for which the puppies, in general give rise to beautiful smiles, affection, attention, "open heart" would result in an area difficult to cross with a precise language. However, some data lead us to believe that the much diffused benevolence towards the puppies has a close connection with the fact that we were all young. So, whether you pull the ball in conscious or unconscious memory, the idea of \u200b\u200bself or the principle of self-preservation easily come to realize that since they were puppies, we also feel very "far" from the bears or tigers, but somehow we feel "close" to the pups of these animals.

Following this line of thought We therefore believe that our relationship with the puppies has to do with our relationship with ourselves, and thus with the extent of our acceptance of various "parts" that make up our identity. We are many things: self-employed and employees, strong and weak, vulnerable and aggressive, and live to die ... and even adults and puppies. What we have been helping to define our identity.

One of the features of the puppies is the transparency with which they express their needs and their emotions and I think this transparency is appreciated by us because we ourselves, we strongly felt by small sense of need and our emotions. Growing up we have become adept at concealing both the needs of both the emotions and also needs to add false and distorted to all of those emotions that will inevitably belong to us. However, under the crust of our character structure built in response to early experiences of loneliness and rejection, beats our deep sensitivity, intact and similar to the puppies we "bump in the face" in a "shameless."

In puppies see at the bottom of our paradise lost, the authenticity we've learned to hide to feel "serious", "strong", "good" or at least bearable. No coincidence that we feel more tenderness for adult animals than for adult humans, as for example an adult dog is more like a puppy than an adult human is like a child. If we try not to tender for an adult dog awaiting his visibly excited "jelly" or looking for cuddling or sleeping.

Nothing prevents us from tenderness to prove ourselves, as adults, or for our fellow men, as we are all basically the needy, vulnerable and sensitive. However, we feel this feeling, especially for puppies because tenderness to prove to ourselves we know in our most sensitive and therefore should have a familiar, usually lost, then our suffering. The armor with which we became very aware of our needs and our limits and not in touch with our emotions, to feel tenderness often prevents us from ourselves, to talk to ourselves about what we are: vulnerable, loving and aware of ' indifference and the waste it produced inner wounds. The character armor limits us and we alter the inner dialogue, make it obvious, "practical", devoid of compassion.

The internal dialogue has as its basic awareness of the desires, the awareness of positive and negative responses that meet our desires, the awareness of emotions (especially joy and pain) with which we respond to rewards and frustrations. The decision presa nell’infanzia da quasi tutte le persone, di ridurre il contatto con il dolore si traduce in una desensibilizzazione rispetto ai desideri o in una non accettazione dei rifiuti. Nel dialogo interno includiamo a volte i “festeggiamenti interiori” per le belle notizie ma quasi sempre escludiamo i “lutti” per le brutte notizie. Preferiamo fare con noi stessi discorsi contorti sulle ingiustizie della vita, sulle colpe nostre e altrui, sul disgusto per la realtà e su tante banalità più o meno intellettualizzate che ci impediscono di farci davvero compagnia.

Le distorsioni del nostro dialogo interno ci allontanano dalla consapevolezza trasparente di ciò che siamo e soprattutto dalla nostra vulnerabilità. Per questo troviamo bello un cucciolo che chiede le coccole: perché sappiamo che egli manifesta la nostra natura più profonda. Per questo in genere non ci troviamo abbastanza belli: perché ormai ci siamo scordati della nostra natura profonda, della nostra vitale dipendenza dagli altri, della nostra esigenza di essere amati e delle tante ferite riportate nelle ricerche d’amore condotte “apertamente” (senza corazza) nei primi anni della nostra vita. Oggi ci amiamo poco ma ci sentiamo invulnerabili. Ci sentiamo feriti da un’offesa ma non da un contatto superficiale, dato che non ci permettiamo di desiderare un contatto profondo. Tale invulnerabilità riguarda sia i tipi “tosti”, sia i soggetti piagnucolosi, perché questi ultimi hanno una struttura caratteriale non meno dura di quella dei tipi “tosti”: si lamentano sempre ma di (presunti) diritti non rispettati e non di bisogni non soddisfatti. I tipi “deboli” non sono mai tristi ma rabbiosi (anche se in modo indiretto).

Su questa linea di pensiero possiamo dire che riusciamo a percepire come belle e cariche di valore quelle realtà che in qualche modo ci appartengono. E possiamo dire che quindi più ci conosciamo e ci rispettiamo, più estendiamo l’ambito di ciò che apprezziamo. Quindi, conoscersi, amarsi, avere cura di sé porta a comprendere amare e rispettare gli altri, con buona pace dei moralisti che svalutano gli atteggiamenti “interessati”: in fact, the more we are interested in ourselves and we are more interested in others. Behavior marked by arrogance, greed, arrogance is not the result of a real interest for ourselves, but a defensive distortion and disturbed relationship with ourselves because we feel the need to devalue wealth, fame, power.

So, being raised in poor conditions on the emotional level, we are armored against the pain, we have limited awareness of our vulnerability (and thus of our humanity), we limited the love for ourselves and our capacity to love others. In general, anything save love for us and same extent as we have feelings of love (ie "well-volenza") to others. With the puppies are easier to "let go" because of the way is "sincere" with which they express their beauty, because it does not threaten us.

People who do not even feel benevolence for the puppies (including babies and children) are so armored that they have broken the thread of consciousness that connects them "at least from a distance" to their deepest inner self. However, there are people very sensitive to puppies and children who are rigid in their willingness and somewhat artificial. I am angry (rightly) to who "mistreat the weak," but are driven more by the desire to fight it with compassion. The border is subtle, but noticeable: the will to fight, we need to feel strong, while the mere willingness to fight is aimed only good for people who want to protect. These people "strict parent", with more to take care of the weak feel strong for the good of their heroes. They take care of the weak not to feel weak. The people who care for babies and children for their own good are warm, simple, and only when you must fight. People taking a strictly protected identity, are at the bottom of cold, hard, edgy and "in need" di combattere. Magari sono anche utili a certe cause, ma esclusivamente sul piano pratico. Sono “perse” in un ruolo di potere, anche se esercitano il potere in ambiti in cui la lotta è ragionevole. Tali persone si distinguono da quelle che non hanno tale problema più per il loro atteggiamento che per i contenuti che affermano, più per il modo in cui agiscono che per ciò che fanno.

La cosa migliore è sicuramente permettersi di sentirsi cuccioli e quindi “allargare” il proprio sentire all’amore per i cuccioli … e magari anche per gli adulti che hanno sepolto la loro fragilità sotto una corazza rigida. Quest’ultimo passaggio è difficile, perché le persone that have dissociated from their fragility can at times be very unpleasant and destructive. Sometimes we have to keep at a distance and even fight but we make a gift to them and to ourselves if we bear in mind that basically they are terrified by what they have inside when exacerbate the other.

In the final analysis, the sensitivity of people towards the pups is an interesting test that may facilitate an understanding of how people understand and accept.

Gianfranco